Skip to main content

Pushing Reset


I had been looking forward to 2016.  My oldest kids were turning 15 then, and I had been anticipating that this was to be the first presidential election that they would be likely to follow through the party-specific campaigns as well as the general election. But what they witnessed, particularly during the debates, was a train wreck. Yes, Donald Trump was embarrassing, but he wasn't the only one. Other candidates, as well as party leaders and even pundits, expressed their views in the worst possible ways. It was as if Jerry Springer took over. It seemed everyone who had anything to say said it as loudly and divisively as possible. And as I write this a year after the election, issue-driven conversations between office-holders as well as between regular people have only gotten worse.

Since the late 80's, when I first became politically aware, discussions about politics have devolved; this is not news to anyone. But the discussions of why the current state of political discourse is so acrimonious has missed the root causes.  Many fingers have pointed at the Internet, which allows the previously unheard masses to throw unfiltered barbs disguised as political positions, emboldened by anonymity. While it's true that we say things to others online that we'd never say face-to-face, I find the argument that this is the reason for the lack of civility to be incomplete.

The truth is that political divisiveness was becoming more pronounced before the Internet was in every home. The cutting remarks we see online are the symptom; not the problem. Just as the web is not the cause, neither is talk radio, although I'd argue that talk radio and online discussions have deepened the divisiveness. Nor are cable news networks the cause of all the hostility, although the fact that the best-known networks have retreated to one political camp or the other has not helped.

No, finger needs to be pointed at something more simple: distraction.

By this, I mean that the people who care about our nation and about their respective local communities enough to have such discussions have been thrown off the trail and have let themselves become misdirected by having their focus shifted toward tangents rather than the core truths which should shape our opinions.

Thus, those on the Right come to regard liberals as welfare-sucking tree-hugging baby-killers, while Leftists think of conservatives as racist neanderthal Pharisees.  Negative thoughts about liberals or conservatives keep us from thinking of what liberalism or conservatism really mean, about the differences between them, and about what positive or negative impacts they have.

It's time to push the Reset button. I'm convinced that if we see Right and Left philosophies for what they really are, and hear what they really say, we won't bother with the name-calling and division. Ideally, we'd consider the core ideas behind these differing political perspectives, and formulate some actual solutions.

It is with this understanding that I will use as a basis for my next few blog posts. I urge readers to consider what is being said, regardless of your Left- or Right-leaning views which you come in with. I assure you I will be as objective as I can when I write them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review--"Love Does" by Bob Goff

Readers of Donald Miller's excellent book "A Million Miles in a Thousand Years" were introduced to Bob Goff, a man who I'd swear is a fictional hero if Miller didn't insist he was a real person. Goff sounds like he's too good to be true.

The Good
The stories in Miller's book are pretty amazing: his kids invited themselves to meet with the leader of every nation in the world, and 29 presidents, kings,  and princes took them up on it. Goff started a New Year's day parade in which several blocks of neighbors participate. He managed to push through several judicial reforms in Uganda which resulted in kids being freed and witch doctors being put out of business. And that's just the start.

Bob Goff is a real person, and he's the real deal; he loves Jesus and has a desire to use what he has to show the love of Jesus in tangible, life-changing ways to as many people as he can. One cannot help but be inspired by reading these stories, and the life les…

I Am Legend: Someone Please Help Me Understand

I recently watched "I Am Legend" for the first time in a couple of years, and the 2nd time ever. I'm not a big zombie-movie guy, but this one is different. My first time watching this film left me satisfied with the notion that I had seen a well-thought-out, intelligent movie, not afraid to pull punches nor to explore important topics that go way beyond typical zombie/apocalyptic movie fare.

The second go-round, though, was disappointing. I noticed plot holes so blaring, so huge, they could not be ignored. I was left with an uneasy feeling that I had been duped the first time around, tricked into thinking I was watching something thought-provoking and cleverly put-together.

I'm holding out hope that the incongruencies I observed were based on some misunderstanding on my part. That's why I am inviting you, the reader, to help explain to me those items which are troubling me, and to assure me that the "I Am Legend" plot is not as full of holes as it appe…

My hopes for 2019

At the end of each year, Miami columnist Dave Barry, one of the funniest cultural observers of my lifetime, recaps the previous year in a humorous way. Barry's strength is pointing out our political posturing, our misplaced priorities, and the way we take it all too seriously. His recap of 2018 is a must-read and is located at https://www.miamiherald.com/living/liv-columns-blogs/dave-barry/article223204095.html
With no promises of being as sharp as Dave Barry, and not trying to be funny, I present to you my in-no-particular-order list of what I pray that 2019 will bring. Some of this is personal to me, and some is for all of us. 
1.I hope to be fully employed for all of 2019.  I'll just say this: 2018 was hard for me. And I'll leave it at that. 
2.I hope to go through 2019 without once seeing a link with the headline "Watch as (fill in the blank) DESTROYS (fill in the blank). This is almost always a link to a video where one person who takes a side in a contentious or di…